5 boosters for "academic-writing" — open source, verified from GitHub, ready to install
Use this before submission when the empirical story is not yet locked. FSE reviewers are SE empiricists; the evaluation is where a good idea is won or lost. The organizing principle is on subjects and baselines a skeptic would accept.
Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing while keeping the precise, evidence-bound voice that scholarship requires and matching the author's own style. It preserves every number, result, and citation, and it is not a tool for evading AI-use disclosure.
This Cursor rule enforces grammatically correct article usage (a, an, the) in code comments to improve readability and professionalism. It benefits developers and teams who prioritize code quality and documentation standards.
Advance the claim directly. Say what is true, what the text argues, what the evidence shows, or what the method does. Do not default to explaining what the text does not claim, does not prove, does not imply, does not cover, or does not attempt. Use a calm, competent authorial posture. Write as an a
"name": "open-academic-paper-machine", "description": "Open Academic Paper Machine — Autonomous academic paper production system with idea evaluation gate and paper-vs-code audit. NEW in v6.4: /audit-paper command and audit-engine skill — static audit of a paper's empirical claims (datasets, models,
